Education
Problems with PADP

Contact Us | A-Z Index
Home Page

Home | About Us | Media | Priorities | Publications | Education | Students | Service Guide | Contact Us

Home


About Us

Media

Priorities

Publications

Education

Students

Service Guide

Contact Us

The Problems

There is not enough money allocated to the program. This has led to highly restrictive means testing.

PADP funding has been seriously eroded because:

  • medical items such as oxygen and CPAP machines (for sleep apnoea) have been introduced into the program and now take up more than 30% of the PADP budget;
  • the pressure on hospital beds and lack of hospital funding has meant that more people are being discharged with supportive equipment taken from PADP funding;
  • the incidence of disability has increased due to a lower mortality rate;
  • developments in technology and design have resulted in more sophisticated equipment, providing more opportunities and a greater demand;
  • funding for the program has never been based on need but simply an arbitrary allocation which has never been enough.

In some cases people are told the waiting list can be as long as 4 years.

There is confusion over:

  • eligibility criteria for assistance;
  • probability of assistance (and time frame);
  • ownership of equipment;
  • why legitimate concerns have been constantly ignored over the last 12 years.

Lack of funding, fragmented management and unclear guidelines have particularly disadvantaged:

  • people requiring complex mobility aids and higher priced items such as wheelchairs;
  • children who are growing and in need of continuing modifications; and
  • people in high population growth areas.

Families already struggling financially cannot cope with additional expenses for necessary equipment and are forced to beg from charities, service clubs and their local community.

Families’ resources are depleted by the costs associated with a disability, and many families are forced into poverty because of these costs.

The (Mis)management

In addition to inadequate funding, the program is restricted by:

  • lack of a centralised policy which results in crisis allocation and no clear rational rationing and assessment procedures. High need areas do not have the budgets to support their demand;
  • fragmented management and discrepancy of the Program’s management between different regions;
  • outdated and inappropriate guidelines e.g. where a family has one working adult they are ineligible for PADP irrespective of other disability-related expenses or the number of children in the family – this is inequitable;
  • lack of accountability – for money, equipment or returned equipment (which is often left in storage);
  • areas with small budgets are reluctant to spend on expensive items i.e. wheelchairs;
  • no consumer involvement in policy development;
  • difficulties in accessing the program for disadvantaged persons e.g. poor literacy skills, people from NESB;
  • inadequate information for people with a newly acquired disability, and parents of children with a disability;
  • no independent complaints mechanism available.

from PADP - The Issues, 1998

this page updated September 25 2006

The Physical Disability Council of NSW Inc (PDCN) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities across New South Wales.
PDCN is involved in information, education and systemic advocacy for, and on behalf of, people with a physical disability.

Contact Us | Legals | Sitemap
©2001-2008 Physical Disability Council of NSW (PDCN) Inc.
Site maintenance -
Craig Andrews
PDCNSW Inc is funded by the NSW Government's Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care.
top