Our Priorities
Cost of Disability

Contact Us | A-Z Index
Home Page

Home | About Us | Media | Priorities | Publications | Education | Students | Service Guide | Contact Us

Welfare Reform — Priority Issue

Home


About Us

Media

Priorities

Publications

Education

Students

Service Guide

Contact Us

BACKGROUND

The Physical Disability Council of Australia (PDCA) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities in Australia, and is connected to a network of Physical Disability Councils in each State and Territory in Australia (PDC’s).

Each council operates independently and consists of individual members who have a physical disability, service organisations, carers/relatives/friends and advocates, who all provide assistance, support and services to people with physical disabilities. The National Council consists of 2 representatives from each established State and Territory Council in Australia (8 in all) who are chosen by their own council members. Each representative must be a person with a physical disability.

PDCA was formed in November 1995 and is the communication link between people with a physical disability and decision makers in government, the community and the business world.

The objectives of PDCA are to
  • achieve positive change in public attitude towards people with physical disabilities by promoting their inclusive participation in all aspects of the Australian community;
  • have formal and informal links with all state and territory Councils and other peak disability organisations;
  • be the acknowledged peak council for people with physical disabilities throughout Australia
  • generate political force through pro-active lobbying and representation to promote the change necessary to meet the needs of people with a physical disability; and
  • include within all its operations an active promotion of the rights, issues and participation of people with a physical disability.

The role of PDCA is to

  • inform all levels of Government, the business sector and the Australian community of the needs of people with a physical disability and to lobby for change as necessary, by; providing a forum for the discussion of issues;
  • disseminating information to State and Territory Physical Disability Councils and to the general public;
  • promoting a formal conduit for views presented to and from government and others; facilitating consultations;
  • education, awareness and community development; and
  • raising funds for the continuance of the Council.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

As a national peak body, representing the physical disability sector, PDCA is well placed to comment on the Cost of Disability for people with physical disabilities.

The council welcomes the opportunity to make a submission to Thomas and Associates conducting the study on behalf of the Department of Social Security, The ‘cost of disability’ is a critical issue for people with physical disabilities. Lack of adequate income support has a major impact on such individuals’ capacity to participate fully in the life of the community and to live as independently as possible within their own household. This document will look at all that impacts on the lives on people with physical disabilities and impacts on the ‘Cost of Disability’.

1.2 The extent of physical disability in Australia

According to the 1993 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers, there were over 5 million Australians who had one or more impairments or long-term health conditions. Whilst many of these people were not restricted by their conditions, 3.2 million had one or more disabilities (18% of the population) and 2.5 million people (14% of the population) had a handicap as a result of their disability. The most common type of handicap involved mobility limitations.

The survey further states that ‘physical conditions’ were reported as the main disabling condition by 88.9 per cent (2,823,200) of persons with a disability). 1 Physical conditions were reported as the main disabling condition by 88.9 per cent (2,823,200) of persons with a disability.2

1.3 Characteristics of people with a physical disability

There are significant dangers in considering the general characteristics (and “needs”) of people with a physical disability.

Like the population at large, there is a great diversity amongst people with a physical disability, in terms of cultural and religious background, income, education, employment and housing.

Additionally, depending on the nature of the physical disability and age of onset, people with a physical disability have a diverse range of experiences relating to specialist services and levels of exclusion from mainstream services and facilities.

It is widely thought that a large proportion of individuals with disabilities are compensated for their handicaps through accident insurance schemes, however this is not so, only a minor proportion receive compensation for injuries, whilst others (previously or currently accommodated in large residential care facilities) have struggled for years to be included as members of the community.

Regardless of individual differences however, it can be said with confidence that people with a physical disability, particularly those with significant mobility handicaps:

a) have great difficulty gaining access to public and private buildings because of physical barriers such as steps, steepness of site and lack of parking;

b) face greater costs relating to their disability (equipment, modifications to vehicles, household appliances and housing, home maintenance, transport, personal and health care and managing a household);

c) generally cannot access public transport and are reliant on taxis or their own vehicle, with varying levels of subsidy throughout Australia;

d) face significant discrimination in finding a job and obtaining promotional opportunities, despite the avenues for redress through disability discrimination legislation;

e) have lower incomes that their age/education level peers due to greater difficulty in gaining employment and in achieving promotion;

f) have fluctuating income if their impairment is associated with medical conditions leading to episodic periods of hospitalisation and/or absence from work. (Such people include people with spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, arthritis, polio etc).

2. INCOME

2.1 Costs associated with physical disability

People with a physical disability have a much lower work-force participation rate and a higher unemployment rate than the general population.

Incomes are generally much lower than for the general population of the same age groups and for many people with a physical disability not in the work force, statutory payments, such as the Disability Support Pension and unemployment benefits, would be the main source of income support. Many people with a physical disability are the spouses of working partners, therefore have no income of their own, and are excluded from many government funded schemes

“I am unable to get the disability support pension as my husband earns slightly too much so I have to pay for everything myself.”3

As indicated earlier, the episodic nature of associated medical conditions has an impact on labour force participation, resulting in lower than average annual wages and salaries for people with a physical disability. Additionally, the trend towards greater levels of part time and casual employment would impact on people with a physical disability. For some, this is a choice, but for many, it reflects the current lack of full time work opportunities. The Churches Agenda for Housing Reform4, shows that 500,000 people would like to work more hours than are currently available. Many would be people with a physical disability.

The costs associated with physical disability have a significant impact on lifestyle, inclusion and independence in the community. Whilst the Mobility Allowance of $56.50 per fortnight is available to some (if looking for employment, in employment or undertaking voluntary work or vocational training), it does not go near offsetting the costs associated with equipment purchase, modifications and getting to work. In Sydney, it is common for people with a physical disability to have taxi fares to work of $150 per week, even with a NSW Government subsidy of 50% toward the taxi fare. A $25 maximum subsidy per journey applies, with severe disadvantages for those in outer urban and rural areas. For instance, someone working 15km from their place of residence would pay in the vicinity of $175 per week, after taking into account the taxi subsidy. These amounts would be similar in all major cities.

Many people on low incomes who receive the Disability Support Pension, are not eligible for the Mobility Allowance. Whilst such people would generally qualify for free equipment and personal care and other forms of home based services through targeted programs, resources are limited and fees often apply. Spouses of working partners are generally ineligible for targeted subsidies and programs. Many people who would otherwise qualify for financial assistance end up paying for equipment, transport, modifications and home maintenance themselves.

Those people in receipt of Department of Social Security private rental assistance pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent. If the costs associated with disability were to be deducted from income before looking at percentage of resultant net income spent on rent, the proportion of private renters with a physical disability paying more than 30% of their disposable income on rent, is likely to be even higher than other disadvantaged groups.

3. CONSUMER COMMENTS

3.1 Comments provided by people with physical disabilities

PDCA in preparing this submission to ‘The Cost of Disability Study’, distributed information on the study to all state and territory representatives in each PDC, as well as organisations and individuals with a registered interest in the work of PDCA. We asked people to contribute specifically to the identified items given in the study. The following comments (in italics) are the result of the request for comment:

3.1.1 Transport and Travel

For most people with a physical disability, the only form of public transport available is the taxi. Most states have a Taxi Subsidy Scheme, but this only pays half the cost and is not transferable between states. Taxis can cost up to $10,000 - $15,000 per year.

Travel for people with disabilities usually involves months of planning, days of phone calls, then the expense of high priced accommodation in order to get accessible rooms, the hire of large cars to carry equipment, plus the added cost of fares, accommodation and wages for escorts and personal carers. For those who travel frequently, either for work, pleasure or medical reasons, will benefit from lightweight equipment and would also benefit from duplicate equipment (an expense directly related to their disability).5

It has been argued that fully accessible public transport will provide benefits not only to people with disabilities but to many other people in the Australian community including the ageing population, people with temporary disabilities and parents with small children and prams. The ‘real’ issue surrounding the lack of public transport is the cost factor. People with physical disabilities are the most disadvantaged sector in that, not only are there few alternatives, but the available alternatives are costly, inconvenient at times, unreliable and detract from the aim of independence and inclusion in society.

Consumer comments for this study and particularly in response to consultations on the DDA Transport Standards have indicated an overwhelming need and support for accessible public transport in Australia.

In a survey of consumer organisations which was commissioned to determine the ‘real issues’ facing people with disabilities, 88% of all respondents reported that access to public transport was a major problem as it restricted their participation in education, employment, medical appointments, shopping and recreation (Downie, 1994).6

As of January 1997, results from submissions to the DDA Transport Standards became known. From these submissions, respondents indicated that they ‘relied almost exclusively on access cabs for their transport needs. For this group, the main impact of accessible public transport will be financial. Although smaller than the public transport user group, people with disabilities reported that they (collectively) spend on average $21,908 per week on transport, four times the amount public transport users spend.7

In remote Aboriginal communities ‘there is no transport for aged or disabled communities. They have to rely on the good will of the Council, School or Health Centre. To catch the community bus for ceremonies will cost on an average $120 return out of their pension and as ceremonies are very important to the aborigines in communities, a lot of people will go without food. The reason they don’t go hunting for food is because you need a vehicle!!!!!!”8

Consumer comments:

“The cost of travel to and from specialised appointments out of Tennant Creek are never fully paid for by the government and I have to make up the difference myself, for my son to see these people, which can be very expensive.”

“ I am fully employed, so therefore am not eligible for some of the services available if you are on a disability pension. It is necessary to purchase and maintain a vehicle to provide necessary mobility for work and recreation. I also needed to purchase a hoist for my car to stow my wheelchair - this was an added expense, but makes it possible for me to be more independent.”

“I travel to work in my car. If I caught a taxi it would cost me approximately $200 per week (with subsidy), this amounts to $9600 per year. Driving my car still costs me around $8,000, taking into account purchase, registration, maintenance and petrol. But I have no choice. There is no suitable accessible transport.”

“Parking is the other issue associated with the costs of travel. It’s essential if you have a physical disability, to park in a place that has access, safety and security and is within an easy distance from your destination.”

“A new car I bought, which would take a manual wheelchair, had to be sold within a year, (at considerable monetary loss) in order to buy a station wagon to be fitted with a hoist to take an electric wheelchair. As an interim, ramps were purchased, but my Carer’s back could not cope with the strain.”

“Transport is a MAJOR issue. While most public transport and services are NOT ACCESSIBLE, fatigue issues mean that only wheelchair taxis are suitable for me. Even with the taxi subsidy voucher, they are far too costly to use to maintain a lifestyle of regularity, going out, they are also too few and unreliable.”

“I have received a Sales Tax Exemption on a motor vehicle but the rising cost of cars means that I will now apply for the Mobility Allowance.”

“ I find using public transport rather difficult, so I have to use a car”

“I cannot use public transport, so I have to use a car to go everywhere, this means that I have to pay substantial parking fees even to visit a public hospital”

“Taxi fares are costly, even though subsidised”

“There is no accessible public transport, and so to go anywhere, the local shop, or 500 km to Melbourne to see a specialist, I have to use a taxi.”

“The income support schemes and allowances do not compensate me fully for the extra costs I face in not being able to access public transport”

“ I spend around $2,500 a year on petrol travelling to and from work and a couple of hundred on tolls. Then there is

registration, insurance and repairs to my vehicle. The Mobility Allowance is around $57 a fortnight.”

“My parking bill in the city is $6,000 per year”

“Lack of access to public Transport imposes severe burdens on the person with a physical disability ”

“The high costs of getting to work, dissuades people with disabilities from employment and social integration.”

“Limited capacity for access and to pay for resources required.”

“Often the costs of transport are insufficiently subsidised and access to local agencies is not sufficient to meet the needs.”

“Trains and taxis are the only public transport available. Trains are inflexible with times and in short supply, hence taxis are used to travel long distances frequently, and even subsidised taxis are expensive.”

“There is no public transport for people with disabilities in Tennant Creek so I have to rely on other people to get me around.”

“ I have to rely on family to get me around in Tennant Creek, if I go away to see a specialist, it often costs me a lot of money as the amount reimbursed by the government does not cover the cost and is not reimbursed until weeks after I return.”

3.1.2 Prescriptions and Therapeutic Consumables

People with physical disabilities do not live with their disability in isolation. For many, there is ongoing medical treatment or monitoring, resulting in continual use of prescribed drugs and consumables. For those eligible for a Health Care Card or similar, the costs of prescriptions are reduced, even so, the frequency of medication and usage will mean that the cost is continual, therefore substantial over the period of a year.

In the budget of September 1996, the cost of prescriptions increased from $2.70 to $3.20. To compound this $166.40 would have to be paid for prescriptions at full price before the concessional rate could be claimed. That was an increase from the amount of $140.40 at the time The safety net remained at $600, after which $3.20 would be paid. The cost and availability of some drugs also changed.

One consumer writes “In order to get $50 extra a fortnight, through the Mobility Allowance, and therefore some deductions with considerable prescribed medication costs, I am pushing myself to voluntary work at least 8 hours a week, but am concerned that I may not be able to keep this up. The loss of the …$50 per week and some concessions would make things difficult for me.”9

In remote Aboriginal communities there are similar issues: “There are no prescriptions used in aboriginal communities. Where medication is required, the clinic has to absorb the total cost. If they run out of money for medication too bad. The Aboriginal Health worker is also placed in an awkward position. If the Disabled person has to have specially prescribed drugs and therapeutic consumables it all depends on the budget for the whole community or that group of people are encouraged to go to Darwin and then Danilla Dilba has to absorb the cost. The disadvantages is spread over aboriginal organisations which disadvantage the urban aboriginals.” 10

Many people with physical disability are members of the CAAS scheme, which has an allocation of $450 per person per year, to ‘buy’ essential commodities particularly for bowel and bladder management. PDCA is aware of the many protests and dissatisfaction from consumers who are ‘members’ of CAAS. For this reason PDCA recommends the following:

a) Review of the allocation of $450 per year per eligible person in many cases this will exceed the need.

b) CAAS should be determined on an individual needs basis, not an ‘across the board’ allocation of $450.00

c) Remove the age limits to ‘members’ when they turn the age of 65

d) Instigate a CAAS scheme for children - CAAS for kids

e) CAAS to remain funded by the Commonwealth with national standards and guidelines

f) Establish a national committee with consumer representatives to ensure CAAS accountability

g) Establish a complaints mechanism as part of the national committee responsibilities - not just resting with the department.

Consumer comments

“The cost is subsidised by my son’s health care card so this expense is kept low, but can get expensive sometimes.”

“The cost of my medication is only half covered by the prescription allowance, I have to often pay large amounts for medication and it is very hard to pay for …when there is no money left out of my pension, so often I put my health at risk and without the medication.”

“ The cost of prescriptions for me is extremely high as I have to pay full costs for my medication until I reach the PBS Safety Net limit, then the cost drops on only some of my medication.”

“Prescriptions currently cost around $120 per annum, this is conservative.”

“No Social Security Pension often means - increased medical costs with prescriptions, health practitioners and aids and appliances.”

“Cost of medications, many items are not on the pharmaceutical list”

“ We need to watch this government, who are advocates of user pays.”

“Living in remote and rural areas increases the cost of these goods dramatically.”

“Not always available in rural and remote areas and postage and/or freight is often added to account for the cost of delivery from other larger centres.”

“The cost of prescriptions per month for me is $25.00 per month.”

“ I have diabetes as well as a physical disability. My medication costs me approximately $20 per month, and that doesn’t count all the blood tests, additional screening, different food, and the cost of my physical disability.”

3.1.3 Health Practitioners

Visiting medical facilities is part of everyday living for a person with a disability. Often the medical practitioner being the vital link between a healthy lifestyle and dependence on hospital care as an inpatient. People with a physical disability are no exception.

Visits to medical practitioners can be inconvenient, having to organise transport and assistance to get there as well as costly if the service does not bulk bill to Medicare. Many people in rural and remote areas have to travel long distances to see Specialists in main centres: “The Allied Health people only get to visit once every two months if they are not seconded to other parts of the Department for six months or more (as has happened in Darwin Remote). The service is ad hoc and now with the Coordinated Care Trials where the Aboriginal Communities have to purchase the above services - it will depend on what the communities priorities are and disability is not one of them.”11 People living in the suburbs of larger cities, can also be faced with long journeys to the city to see Specialists.

In the September 1996 Federal Budget, it was announced that out of hospital specialist services would rise from $30.60 to $50 on November 1996. It was also announced that there would be no possibility of doctors billing Medicare for services of unusual length or complexity. Just such services are often required by people with physical disabilities, due to the complexities or obscure nature of the disability or its impact on their ability to physically assist the doctor when requiring an examination.

Some Specialists do not bulk bill and require payment ‘up front’, this means that the individual is faced with a large account to pay, as well as the costs associated with getting to the Specialist in the first place. Medical practitioners also referpatients to other services, such as Physiotherapy, Radiology, Occupational Therapy and many other specialist facilities, to follow up on diagnosis or treatment. Health Insurance can often offset some of these costs, but people with physical disabilities pay a substantial loading on the premium as with personal life insurance.

Dental care is another area where people with physical disabilities have been financially disadvantaged. Previously, people who were on a Disability Support Pension, could access Commonwealth Dental Services. however in the 1996 Budget came the announcement that: at the end of 1996, the Commonwealth Government would abolish the Commonwealth Dental program. Four million concession card holders will no longer have access to free dental treatment!

Consumers comments:

“My son gets this service for free, but if he has to go to Alice Springs (500kms away) or Adelaide (2200km away) it can be quite expensive.”

“Health practitioners is a free service to me, but getting to and from them is costly.”

“I have to pay full price for any of these services, I’m not entitled to any concessions.”

“I choose to take out Hospital Cover, rather than just rely on Medicare because of my disability and the need for a Doctor of my choice. In recent years I‘ve had a number of trips to hospital, which has incurred additional expenses.”

“Medicare is at increased risk of being dismantled or watered down further, pushing costs of health care on to consumers. People with disabilities should resist these changes.”

“Access for people from rural and remote areas is extremely expensive for those people who have disabilities. Often the costs of transport to medical facilities, are insufficiently subsidised and access to local agencies is not sufficient to meet the needs. In addition, any access to private health care such as therapy is financially not viable for people with disabilities and many people find access to public systems an access issue in terms of prioritising, waiting lists, distance etc.”

“The CAAS has been a God send BUT I was only accepted because I get a “Mobility Allowance! I get catheters, gloves, continence sheets, dressing packs, laxatives, lubricants, syringes, sterile water, catheter valves and more. What will I do if I can’t keep pushing the voluntary work?”

“There is no competition so prices remain high.”

“Doctors don’t always bulk bill and I have to pay up front.”

“I have to travel long distances to see the doctor.”

“My doctor has moved , there goes my continuity of medical care.”

“I have to drive to the doctor, or get someone to take me, otherwise I can’t get there.”

“The cost for doctor’s visit per year for me is: $120.00 per year”

“There’s no point in me taking our Health Insurance, I have to wait ages before I qualify to get reimbursement for the pre-existing conditions, ie physical disability.”

3.1.4 Hospital Visits

Hospital visits will often have unpleasant memories for many people with a physical disability, having spent long periods of recuperation, rehabilitation and treatment.

Hospital locations are not always near the persons’ home, particularly in rural and remote areas. This can result in one or two of the family members travelling to the hospital, accommodating family members nearby, travel costs and distance, to and from the hospital for visits, (especially if it is outpatient treatment) childcare arrangements and costs, and loss of income for family members who work and for the person with a disability, who may also work.

Consumer comments:

“There is no cost for this service to me, but the only service available in Tennant Creek is bad. I had to get a dressing changed the other day and I had to wait for 7 hours for this to be done and for a person who is disabled, sitting for seven hours can be very painful and uncomfortable.”

“Here in Tennant Creek, hospital is free as it’s a public hospital but if I go away, I have to pay for these services.”

“I need to travel a long way to access the hospital (at least 2 hours).”

“The cost of accommodating my family if I go to hospital, is enormous.”

“If I go to hospital, that means loss of wages.”

“Out of pocket expenses after my last hospitalisation were $150.00”

“At the moment the major problem is finding accessible accommodation available in Darwin for disabled people to access the Royal Darwin Hospital and Rehabilitation Centre.

3.1.5 Housing and accommodation

Many people with physical disabilities, particularly those who rely on wheelchairs and other aids for mobility, are severely limited in their housing choices, not only through low work force participation and higher unemployment rates, but also through lack of provision of barrier-free, adaptable housing, particularly in the private sector.

Housing choice is as important to people with physical disabilities as anyone else in the community. Housing choice must take into consideration affordability, appropriateness (accessible design, safety features), security of tenure and location (proximity to family and social networks, services and facilities).

PDCA is aware that many people with a disability, particularly wheelchair users, are so severely limited in housing choice (whether home purchasers or private renters) that they must spend more than otherwise on purchasing or renting larger or more modern housing within close proximity to specialist services).

For instance, in Sydney, a person without a disability can buy a 2 bedroom unit, in a 3 storey block, for a cost in the vicinity of $90,000 - $100,000 OR a house that is slightly run down, requiring a little maintenance and building skills, for around the same price. On the other hand, a person with a disability cannot live in a 3rd floor unit unless there is an elevator OR alternatively a person with a physical disability will have to buy a modern house in the city and pay up to double the price, or buy a cheaper modern house situated miles out of the city with little or no access to transport and services. That is, people with a physical disability are forced to pay up to $100,000 more for a house than those without a disability.

In large cities, many people with disabilities choose to settle in areas close to the hospital, or in suburbs with other accessible facilities and services. These are generally high cost areas. The alternative is to purchase or rent affordable housing on the urban fringe, where necessary services are so few, and taxi transport costs are astronomical.

In remote communities, the story is the same: “If there is an aged home or type of institution in the community, disabled people cannot stay there as it is too expensive. The standard 85% charged by the commonwealth deprives the person (aboriginal) of extras such as attending ceremonies (and there may be approximately 100 + per year at $120).”12

Consumer comments:

“There is very limited amount of disabled housing here in Tennant Creek.”

“We have had to rent privately (in Tennant Creek), we are lucky our landlord doesn’t mind the modifications we have had to do.”

“With public housing rental rising all the time we find it very had to pay our rent, also getting anything done to the house is just about impossible or it takes months or years for it to be done.”

“I am not eligible to receive rent assistance as I have medically retired (age 34) and receive a fortnightly superannuation payment.”

“I think a person living in inner Sydney would face additional costs from a similarly disabled person living in the Western Suburbs.”

“Housing reforms propose that market rents be charged for properties according to their location. For many people living in inner city areas, this will result in an increase in rent and a reduction in the ability to afford the other necessities of life”

“Public housing policies which cater for the social integration of people with disabilities needs to be fostered. Also banks should be lobbied by disability community for greater access to cheap and affordable finance.”

“Major issues for both adults with disabilities and families of children with disabilities. The cost of modifying premises and lack of support in this area is one specific barrier.”

“Severe lack of accessible housing especially Department of Housing. This leads to consumers paying for expensive modifications.”

“Suitable housing for people with physical disabilities is often only for those who can afford proper modifications. Modified Department of Housing buildings are usually totally inadequate. I am helping coordinate a housing co-op for people with physical disabilities to build their own purpose built housing with community housing funds. My fear is that if the Federal Government abolishes community housing funding, where do people with special needs adequately live?”

“I am currently trying to purchase a property - I do own the unit I live in, but wish to move for a few reasons. I want to remain in the same area if possible to maintain current networks and not be any further from my place of employment. I have spent considerable time and money chasing around looking at various properties. Without exception, all the properties I have looked at would have needed considerable money spent to make them accessible because of my disability.

The trick is trying to find something with the least to spend. …Expense would cover such things as ramp access to eliminate steps, alterations to the kitchen because the bench tops are too high, alterations in the bathroom, again because of access problems, shower recess etc. …Added to the purchase price, the whole exercise becomes impossible.”


FOOTNOTES

1 Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1993, Disability, Ageing and Carers Summary of findings. Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 4430.0, Canberra

2 Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1993, Disability, Ageing and Carers Summary of findings. Australian Bureau of Statistics Catalogue No. 4430.0, Canberra

3 Comment from participant submission to PDCA. April 1997.

4 Churches Agenda for Housing Reform, Australia 1996

5 Murray. Max., Extra costs of Disability. Personal Comments to PDCA submission. April 1997

6 Downie, Angus., Target 2015 A Vision for the Future Access to Transport in Australia for all Australians. August 1994. Australian Government Publishing Service.

7 Corcoran. Maurice. Transport Standards Update - Part II in Quadwrangle Newsletter. February 1997.Australian Quadriplegic Association.

8 Danilla Dilba Aboriginal Organisation for people with disabilities. Darwin. NT.

9 Comments from Colleen Percival

10 Danilla Dilba Aboriginal Organisation for people with disabilities. Darwin. NT.

11 Danilla Dilba Aboriginal Organisation for people with disabilities. Darwin. NT.

12 Danilla Dilba Aboriginal Organisation for people with disabilities . Darwin NT


— Physical Disability Council of Australia Submission to the Department of Social Security, 1997

Welfare Reform — Priority Issue

this page updated September 22 2006

The Physical Disability Council of NSW Inc (PDCN) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities across New South Wales.
PDCN is involved in information, education and systemic advocacy for, and on behalf of, people with a physical disability.

Contact Us | Legals | Sitemap
©2001-2008 Physical Disability Council of NSW (PDCN) Inc.
Site maintenance -
Craig Andrews
PDCNSW Inc is funded by the NSW Government's Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care.
top