Our Priorities
Proposals put to the Minister of Disability Services

Contact Us | A-Z Index
Home Page

Home | About Us | Media | Priorities | Publications | Education | Students | Service Guide | Contact Us

Personal Support — Priority Issue

Home


About Us

Media

Priorities

Publications

Education

Students

Service Guide

Contact Us

Introduction

As representatives of the 28 disability sector organisations signing the letter of 6th May 2002 to Hon Mrs Faye Lo Po' regarding 'personal support services for people with physical disability in NSW', we welcome the opportunity to meet with the Minister.

We thank Mrs Lo Po' for meeting us on 4th July 2002.

Our concerns were summarised in the letter of 6th May as follows:

  • There is a need for a thorough re-examination of the full range of personal assistance support systems to lead to a new strategic direction; and

  • There is a real crisis in the current service system placing people with disability at risk of not being able to continue to live at home independently.

We hope to find common ground with the Minister and identify immediate and long-term strategies for addressing unmet need. We recognise that the context of debate around these matters has not been made easier by the reluctance of the Commonwealth Government to speedily and satisfactorily reach agreement on the CSTDA. We feel, however, that there is scope and time (in this final period of the current Government's term of office) to fund and implement solutions to current and long-term problems.

Recent Progress

As representatives of a broader constituency of interest we are pleased to acknowledge recent developments and Government decisions that have addressed some of the issues of concern to us. Specifically:

  • We welcome the decision to fund the supplementation of hours for 65 existing recipients of support through the Attendant Care Programme.
  • We welcome the decision to offer one-off and recurrent funding to service providers of the Attendant Care Programme to raise the hourly rate payable by DADHC to $30 from 1st July 2002.
  • We welcome the commitment to review the new hourly rate for Attendant Care Programme and to enhance that rate from 1st July 2003.
  • We welcome confirmation in this year's Budget Announcement that funds will be provided to meet the Government's commitment to reduce the Attendant Care Programme waiting list by 100 people over four years.

It is our hope that we can work with Government and DADHC to identify and implement further financial and non-financial strategies for making further progress possible in the future.

Unresolved Issues & Unmet Need

Despite the progress acknowledged above, it is clear to us that significant and substantial unmet need continues to exist with regard to personal assistance and support services in NSW. Some of that unmet need can only be described (for those living with its consequences) as a crisis, requiring immediate intervention. Some of that unmet need requires a partnership involving all stakeholders to identify and implement reform strategies for modernisation of personal support systems for the long-term benefit of residents and taxpayers in New South Wales.

  • At least 300 people are currently on the waiting list for support through the High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool) of the Home Care Service of NSW.

  • In some HCS areas (Inner West, Lismore, Newcastle and Shoalhaven are among the examples known to us) people with high levels of support requirements have been told not to bother with applications for support because no funds are available.

  • Despite the resolution of issues around the Attendant Care Programme hourly rate and confirmation of previously announced funds to reduce the waiting list, more than 100 people with disability remain on the waiting list.

  • The findings of the ADD Review of the Attendant Care Programme have not been implemented.

  • As we illustrate in our "Case Studies" appendix, people with disability continue to live inappropriately in hospital rehabilitation units and/or are being discharged from Sydney units to regional rehabilitation units.

  • As our "Case Studies" illustrate, people with disability experience difficulties with inadequate service provision (in terms of hours available, quality and flexibility) from the State's largest provider, the Home Care Service of NSW.

  • Inconsistency of service provision is a flawed characteristic of local implementation of Home Care Service policies. Variation of service standards and implementation exists between HCS branches and, within branches, between service coordinators.

We wish to use the meeting with Minister, held on 4th July 2002, as a springboard for seeking, planning, funding and implementing solutions to the problems which led us to write to Mrs Lo Po' in the first instance.

Strategies for addressing current unmet need and initiating longer-term reform

In our letter of 6th May 2002 we proposed to the Minister a number of strategies and actions. They would, in our judgement, take us a considerable way towards solving immediate and longer-term problems.

Our principle aim in meeting with the Minister on 4th July 2002 is to find common ground around which the respective stakeholders can take action to build and sustain a partnership that solves problems and delivers high quality services at the same time as providing value for taxpayer's money. Some of what we propose will require Government to allocate new money to personal support services. Some of what we propose requires re-allocation of existing funds within the context of a whole of government approach to unmet need. Some of what we propose involves no money at all but does require commitment to transforming current best practices into State-wide practice.

Specifically we seek the support of the Minister in these areas

  1. New funds totaling $5.25 Million on a recurrent basis are required to eliminate the current waiting list for support through the High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool).

    Based on assumptions of average levels of need (as described in HCS documentation) the whole of government cost of the current waiting list would be $13.25 Million. The Government, however, is already spending some of this money, on people on the waiting list. Some are in hospital units; some are receiving support from Home Care Service branches at levels below their actual need. In estimating the funds we believe to be required to eliminate the High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool) waiting list we have made two assumptions:

    1. i. Most of the people on the waiting list will be currently receiving Government funded support through one programme or another that equates roughly to the upper limit of HCS hours before High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool) funding would 'kick-in' (i.e. 60 hours per month).

      ii. Some people on the waiting list are currently funded inappropriately to live in rehabilitation nursing home or hospital beds at costs, which greatly exceed those of supporting people to live at home.

    Using these assumptions we estimate that somewhere in the region of $5.25 Million is required to eliminate the High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool) waiting list.

  2. New funds totaling $5 Million on a recurrent basis are required to eliminate the current waiting list for the Attendant Care Programme.

    In November 2001 48 people on the Attendant Care Programme waiting list were allocated funds at a cost of approximately $2 Million. The average cost per person was almost $42,000 per year. Assuming that everyone currently on the waiting list was to be deemed eligible at the new hourly rate, we estimate that approximately $5 Million is required.

  3. The establishment of a State-wide Review (based on the draft Terms Of Reference attached as an appendix) to report to the Minister on reform and modernisation of the personal assistance and support services in NSW.

We feel strongly that a new strategic framework, based upon well-established principles, is required to ensure that people with physical disability can be supported to live as valued, participating citizens in the communities of NSW. We believe that the development of such a framework requires the establishment of a Review Panel or Advisory Committee (led by DADHC) similar to the State-wide PADP Advisory Committee led by NSW Health. Its objective would be to reform, re-structure and modernise personal assistance and support services in NSW, reporting to you as the Minster responsible for these matters.

The review would consider the entire range of needs and services provided by Government and non-government agencies and could incorporate existing review data such as that already conducted into the Home Care Service, the High Needs Support Pool (Virtual Pool) and the Attendant Care Programme.

Participants from the Disability Sector

Mr John Moxon, President, Physical Disability Council of NSW

Ms Wendy Potter, President, People With Disabilities NSW

Ms Kim Rowles, Service User & Committee Member, PDCN

Ms Amanda Ellison, Manager, Community Living Service

The Northcott Society

And, staff member support:

Mr Dougie Herd, Executive Officer, Physical Disability Council of NSW

Thursday, 4th July 2002

Attachment Case Studies, Media Release: No Way Forward


— PDCN Submission to Department of Urban Affairs and Planning - May, 2001

Personal Support — Priority Issue

this page updated September 23 2006

The Physical Disability Council of NSW Inc (PDCN) is the peak body representing people with physical disabilities across New South Wales.
PDCN is involved in information, education and systemic advocacy for, and on behalf of, people with a physical disability.

Contact Us | Feedback Form | Legals
©2001-2008 Physical Disability Council of NSW (PDCN) Inc.
Site maintenance -
Craig Andrews
PDCNSW Inc is funded by the NSW Government's Department of Ageing, Disability and Home Care.
top